Practice Overview

Vietnam operates a first-to-file intellectual property system, which carries significant strategic implications for rights holders. Unlike first-to-use jurisdictions, where prior commercial use can establish trademark rights, Vietnam grants exclusive rights to the first applicant to file a valid application with the National Office of Intellectual Property (NOIP). This means that even well-established foreign brands can face challenges from local applicants who file first, a phenomenon that has affected numerous multinational companies entering the Vietnamese market. Early filing is not merely advisable — it is essential.

Our prosecution practice manages the full lifecycle of NOIP examination procedures, from initial filing through to registration or final refusal. Trademark applications undergo formal examination within one month and substantive examination within approximately twelve to fourteen months. During this period, applications may face absolute grounds refusals (lack of distinctiveness, descriptive marks) or relative grounds refusals (conflict with earlier marks). We develop prosecution strategies that include responding to office actions, overcoming refusals through evidence of use or acquired distinctiveness, and coordinating opposition proceedings where necessary.

Cross-border IP coordination is a critical component of our practice. Through our membership in the International Trademark Association (INTA), the Asian Patent Attorneys Association (APAA), and the Vietnam Intellectual Property Association (VIPAA), we maintain relationships with associate firms across Asia, Europe, and North America. This network enables us to manage multi-jurisdictional filing programmes, coordinate enforcement actions across borders, and advise on the territorial scope of protection required for clients with regional or global operations.

Enforcement in Vietnam proceeds through three principal channels: administrative enforcement, civil litigation, and criminal prosecution. Administrative raids, conducted by market surveillance agencies and economic police, remain the fastest route to stopping infringement and seizing counterfeit goods. Civil litigation before the People's Courts provides the possibility of damages awards, though quantification remains challenging. Criminal prosecution applies to offences exceeding statutory thresholds and carries deterrent value, though practical application is selective. We advise clients on the appropriate enforcement channel based on the nature of the infringement, the identity of the infringer, and the commercial objectives at stake.

IP due diligence for M&A transactions requires a methodical approach that extends beyond verifying registration certificates. We assess the chain of title for registered rights, identify gaps in protection, evaluate the scope of licensing obligations, and review the enforceability of confidentiality and assignment clauses. For technology acquisitions, we examine whether know-how and trade secrets are adequately protected under Vietnamese law, which does not recognise statutory trade secret rights in the same manner as some common law jurisdictions. Our due diligence reports are structured to inform valuation decisions and to identify post-closing actions required to secure the target's IP position.

Key Capabilities

  • Trademark Registration — Comprehensive trademark search, filing, and prosecution through NOIP. We handle opposition proceedings and appeals to secure your brand protection.
  • Patents & Utility Solutions — Patent drafting, filing, and prosecution for inventions and utility solutions. We manage maintenance and annuity payments to keep your patents active.
  • Industrial Design & Copyrights — Protection for product designs, artistic works, and software. We handle registration and enforcement of design and copyright assets.
  • Licensing & Technology Transfer — Drafting and negotiating assignment agreements, licensing contracts, franchising agreements, and technology transfer deals.
  • IP Enforcement & Litigation — Administrative, civil, and criminal enforcement actions. We represent clients in infringement cases and coordinate customs border enforcement.
  • IP Portfolio Review — Comprehensive IP audits for M&A transactions, assessing portfolio strength, identifying risks, and evaluating licensing obligations.

Our Process

01

Portfolio Audit — We assess your existing IP assets, identify gaps, and evaluate risks and commercial opportunities.

02

Filing & Prosecution — We prepare and submit applications through NOIP, managing examination responses and oppositions.

03

Enforcement — We take action against infringement through administrative raids, civil litigation, criminal prosecution, or customs enforcement.

04

Licensing & Commercialisation — We structure and negotiate licensing, assignment, and technology transfer agreements to monetize your IP.

Important Considerations

Vietnam operates on a first-to-file basis, making early registration critical for securing your rights. Foreign companies should consider filing trademark applications before public announcement of market entry plans, as the interval between announcement and filing can be exploited by third-party squatters seeking to extract settlement payments or block market access entirely.

Non-use cancellation risks require maintaining evidence of use to protect against cancellation actions. Under the Law on Intellectual Property 2005 (as amended 2022), a trademark registration is vulnerable to cancellation on non-use grounds if the mark has not been used for a continuous period of five years without proper reasons. We advise clients on the type and frequency of evidence that will satisfy NOIP requirements in cancellation proceedings.

Multiple enforcement routes are available: administrative raids, civil litigation, criminal prosecution, and customs enforcement. Each route offers different timelines, cost profiles, and remedial outcomes. Administrative action is typically fastest but does not award damages. Civil litigation offers damages but involves longer timelines and higher evidentiary standards. Customs recordal enables border enforcement against infringing imports and exports.

International coordination through associate firms enables multi-jurisdictional filings and enforcement across Asia and beyond. The Madrid Protocol allows for international trademark registrations designating Vietnam, though national filing remains advisable for clients requiring immediate protection given the processing timelines and potential complications of Madrid designations.

The Law on Intellectual Property 2005 (amended 2022) governs all IP rights in Vietnam and underpins our advisory. The 2022 amendments introduced significant changes to the grounds for refusal, opposition procedures, and criminal thresholds, as well as new provisions governing collective marks and certification marks that affect how industry associations and standard-setting bodies protect their marks.

Technology transfer agreements must be registered with the Ministry of Science and Technology to be enforceable against third parties. The registration requirement applies to licensing agreements involving patents, utility solutions, and know-how, and failure to register can affect the licensor's ability to enforce contractual restrictions or claim tax deductions for royalty payments.